Writing in Inside Housing, Caroline Crawley, National Committee member of Living Rent (a renters union in Scotland) says that the ending of the Rent Freeze at the end of March “spells disaster for Living Rent’s members and all social housing tenants”.
“Our members believe that the government’s decision displays a disregard for social housing tenants and shows how, too often, their landlords’ perspectives take priority over their needs and experiences. As a union, we believe that this emergency protection bill has missed an opportunity to really understand the challenges facing social tenants and to provide appropriate governmental support and intervention.”
“Social housing tenants are among the lowest paid and therefore least likely to have seen their wages increase, even though inflation hit 11% last year. They are among the most vulnerable and yet did not receive any protections or greater support. Too many have told us they are worried about impending increases and being squeezed between upcoming rent increases and the next energy rises in April. With many tenants relying on old overnight storage heaters which are now too expensive to run, a lot of people have to choose between heating and heating.”
The government said that rent increases would not impact many social tenants, arguing that three-quarters of tenants will see an increase in benefits. But the latest available research suggests that this is only true of 59% of tenants (with many having only partial benefits).
“This leaves 41% of some of the lowest paid, who will be squeezed between stagnant wages, rising costs and rent, without financial support. A number of our members have said that they worry about debt and struggling to keep their homes.”
“And on top of this, the average promised by social landlords hides large differences. Some proposals suggest increasing rent by 7%, 9% or 10%. All these proposals are higher than the 6.1% increase Mr Harvie said housing associations had committed to. As a union, we believe that the sector’s commitment to an average increase enables individual housing associations to increase rent up to the level of inflation.”
“Our members resent rent increases being justified by often unaccountable and undemocratic rent consultations. Social housing providers say that they are consulting on increases and tenants will be able to have a say on what works for them. But our members believe that the consultations are an exercise in flimsy democracy.
This is something that we, as a union, have been highlighting for two years, denouncing consultations with very low participation rates. In some instances, increases were already decided in pre-meetings by the board and then rubber-stamped through consultations, with a presupposition that rents would increase.”
“Too many buildings remain unmodernised, energy inefficient and with many outstanding structural issues. As the cost of living hit hard this winter, some of our members faced bills of £300 per month. With energy costs set to rise again in April, the situation will not get any better.”
“This is a missed opportunity for the government to examine how it supports social and council tenants and ensure that they have accessible, affordable and quality homes. The government needs to stop cutting social housing budgets, leading social landlords to then turn to tenants for cash. Instead, it needs to improve the sector through grants for retrofits and new builds, greater regulation of rent increases and rent consultations, and more regulation around mould and repairs. Increasing the Tenant Grant Fund also means fewer people would be at risk of losing their homes through arrears build-up.”